Assessing+the+impact

Wiki Assessment with Alignment to NETS for Students* Criteria
Please review the following assessment tool for evaluating a wiki site. The assessment tool focuses on four main themes based on the NETS for Students*. Under each of the themes, there are criteria listed with specific examples of mastery, proficiency and developing skills.
 * |||| ** Criteria ** || ** Mastery ** || ** Proficient ** || ** Developing ** ||
 * ** Creativity & Innovation* ** || Organization || A Table of contents is used to streamline and categorize information. || Clear headings and titles delineate the information topics. || The information lacks organization. ||
 * ^  || Presentation Quality || Graphics are well placed and add visual interest. They are relevant and support the written text. || Graphics add visual interest to the site. || The site lacks quality in the presentation due to a lack of graphics and other publishing components. ||
 * ^  || New technologies || Web 2.0 tools have been used to enhance the usability of the site. Technologies may include; * widgets,
 * sound and video,
 * RSS feeds,
 * file uploading. || Web 2.0 tools have been used. Technologies may include; * widgets,
 * sound and video,
 * RSS feeds,
 * file uploading. || Few or no Web 2.0 tools have been used. The technologies used have little or no function and do not enhance the site. ||
 * ** Communication & Collaboration* ** || Collaboration || Co-authoring is evident in the page history with 3 or more individuals providing content. User authoring is promoted with ease in access to editing features, discussions posts and the ability to upload content. || Co-authoring is evident in the page history. Users can provide feedback through discussion posts. || The wiki provides very little evidence of collaboration and/or user input. ||
 * ^  || Spelling & Grammar || Language used communicates clearly and precisely. The entire site is void of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. || Language used communicates information provided on the site. There are few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. || There are instances of poor language use, which creates confusion. There are many grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. ||
 * ** Research & Information Fluency* ** || Content || Issues are relevant and always relate to theme/topic. Information is up-to-date and provides the reader with current news and pertinent issues. Hyperlinks and other hypermedia aid understanding and add interest to the topic. || Information and research is well thought out and relate to the theme/topic of the site. Some hyperlinks and other hypermedia is provided to support the content. || The information is somewhat relevant to the theme/topic. The information provided is out dated and does not address current news and issues. ||
 * ^  || Originality || Information is original and provides new ideas and insights. || Information is summarized. || Information is copied. ||
 * ** Digital Citizenship & Responsibility* ** || Validity & Citation of Work || Cited resources are correctly listed on the wiki page. A bookmarking tool (ex. del.icio.us) and tagging have been used effectively. || Resources are correctly cited but not organized. || Cited resources are not listed on the page. Readers have no access to referenced materials. ||
 * adapted from: Natuional Educational Technology Standards for Students, Second Edition, © ISTE ® (International Society for Technology in Education), [|www.iste.org]. All rights reserved. ||